The dairy industry has long sought ways to maximise milk production. One controversial method involves injecting cows with recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST). While rBST may boost milk yields, its negative effects on cows, milk quality and cheese production cannot be ignored. This blog explores how rBST works, its impact on animal welfare, and why it raises concerns for consumers and cheesemakers alike.
SEE ALSO: Why raw milk cheese is the ultimate expression of time and place →
What is rBST, and how does it work?
Recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST) is a synthetic version of a hormone naturally produced by cows. Scientists create it using genetic engineering. Once injected, it stimulates the production of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), which increases milk production.
With rBST, cows can produce 10-15% more milk. However, this comes at a cost. The increased milk production places significant strain on a cow’s body, leading to health problems. These include mastitis (a painful udder infection), lameness and reduced fertility.
Farmers typically begin administering rBST about 8-10 weeks after a cow gives birth. Injections are given every two weeks to sustain higher milk yields.
The impact of rBST on animal welfare
One of the most significant criticisms of rBST is its effect on animal welfare. Cows treated with rBST face higher rates of health issues than untreated cows.
- Mastitis: Mastitis is a bacterial infection of the udder that causes swelling, pain, and reduced milk quality. Studies show that rBST-treated cows have a higher risk of developing mastitis. Treating mastitis often requires antibiotics, which can further complicate milk quality.
- Lameness: Increased milk production puts physical stress on a cow’s body. This strain can lead to lameness, a condition where cows struggle to walk or stand. Lameness affects a cow’s mobility and overall well-being, reducing their quality of life.
- Reproductive problems: Cows injected with rBST are more likely to experience reproductive issues, including difficulty conceiving. This reduces their productivity and shortens their lifespan on farms.
Animal welfare organisations and consumers alike have raised concerns about these issues. Many argue that the increased milk yield does not justify the suffering caused to the cows.
How rBST affects milk quality
rBST also has a significant impact on the quality of milk it helps produce. While regulatory agencies like the FDA and WHO deem rBST milk safe for consumption, concerns remain.
Elevated IGF-1 levels
Milk from rBST-treated cows contains higher levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). IGF-1 is a hormone linked to cell growth and repair in humans. Some studies suggest elevated IGF-1 levels could be associated with increased risks of certain cancers. Although these findings are not conclusive, many consumers prefer to avoid any potential risks.
Higher somatic cell counts
Cows with mastitis produce milk with higher somatic cell counts. These cells, which include pus and immune cells, can affect the milk’s flavour, texture and overall quality. Farmers must test milk regularly to ensure it meets safety standards, but elevated somatic cell counts remain a concern.
Antibiotic contamination
Treating mastitis often requires antibiotics. While farmers must follow withdrawal periods to prevent antibiotic residues in milk, mistakes can happen. The overuse of antibiotics in rBST-treated cows also contributes to the global problem of antibiotic resistance.
How rBST impacts cheese production
The effects of rBST on milk quality can extend to cheese production. Cheesemakers rely on high-quality milk to produce cheeses with the desired texture, flavour and appearance. Milk from rBST-treated cows may present challenges for artisans and industrial producers alike.
Altered milk composition
Higher somatic cell counts from rBST-treated cows can change the composition of milk. These changes may impact curd formation, a crucial step in cheesemaking. Poor curd formation can lead to lower yields and inconsistent cheese textures.
Consumer perception
Many cheese lovers prefer products made from rBST-free milk. Artisanal cheesemakers often highlight their use of high-quality, hormone-free milk to attract discerning customers. For these producers, avoiding rBST milk is essential to maintaining their reputation.
Global regulations on rBST
The use of rBST remains a controversial topic worldwide. While it is legal in some countries, many have banned it due to animal welfare and public health concerns.
Countries that allow rBST
The United States is the largest market for rBST use. Other countries, including Brazil, South Africa and some regions of Mexico, also permit its use.
Countries that ban rBST
Many countries, including those in the European Union, Canada, Australia and Japan, have banned rBST. These bans reflect concerns about animal welfare and the potential health risks of elevated IGF-1 levels in milk.
Choosing rBST-free cheese
As awareness of rBST’s impact grows, many cheesemakers in the United States are committing to using rBST-free milk. Here are a few notable examples:
Tillamook Cheese
Tillamook, a cooperative based in Oregon, uses milk exclusively from local farms that pledge not to use rBST. Their cheeses, including their iconic Cheddars, reflect their commitment to quality and sustainability.
Rogue Creamery
Rogue Creamery, another Oregon-based producer, uses organic, rBST-free milk for all its cheeses. Known for their award-winning Rogue River Blue, Rogue Creamery prioritises sustainability and animal welfare.
Cabot Creamery and Organic Valley
Cabot Creamery and Organic Valley are also leading names in rBST-free cheese production. Their products cater to consumers seeking natural and ethical dairy options.
Why choose rBST-free dairy?
Choosing rBST-free dairy products benefits cows, consumers and the environment. Supporting cheesemakers who avoid rBST promotes better animal welfare and ensures high-quality, natural cheese.
When shopping, look for labels stating “rBST-free” or choose trusted brands like Tillamook and Rogue Creamery. By making this choice, you’re helping to create a more sustainable and ethical dairy industry.
Conclusion
While rBST may boost milk production, the cost to cows, milk quality and cheese production is too high to ignore. Animal welfare issues, potential health risks, and altered milk composition make rBST a controversial and undesirable practice.
By choosing rBST-free cheese, consumers can enjoy better-tasting, ethically produced dairy while supporting sustainable farming practices. For the future of cows and cheese lovers alike, rBST-free is the way forward.
Cheese lover. Scientist. Created a website and a Youtube channel about cheese science because he could not find answers to his questions online.
